Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BND vs ILF: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BND returned −1.3% to ILF's +17.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BND and ILF

Net assets: $161.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF, and $3.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Latin America 40 ETF.

At a glance
−1.3%
BND total return, 1 year
+17.2%
ILF total return, 1 year
0.03%
BND expense ratio
0.47%
ILF expense ratio

Pair scorecard

BND costs 0.44 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 18.5 points; BND is far larger, $161.4bn against $3.8bn.

BND vs ILF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBNDILF
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.3%+17.2%
Drawdown
Below its high3.5%, high on Aug 6, 202013.7%, high on Oct 12, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted IndexS&P Latin America 40
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.47%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$161.4bn$3.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund55.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BND and ILF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BND ILF
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BND
MKTLIQ 0.92%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.40%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.39%
Only in ILF
NU HOLDINGS CLASS A 7.53%
PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG PRE 6.95%
ITAU UNIBANCO HOLDING ADR REP PRE 6.61%
PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG SA 6.61%
VALE ADR REPRESENTING ONE 6.45%
GRUPO MEXICO B 6.26%
GPO FINANCE BANORTE 4.48%
CREDICORP LTD 3.96%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF ILF iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Tracks an index of Latin America 40
Total return, 1 year −1.3% +17.2%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +0.1 pts vs AGG not measured
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.47%
Holdings 16301 46
Net assets, BND as of Sep 30, 2026 and ILF as of Oct 28, 2026 $161.4bn $3.5bn

BND and ILF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

ILF flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BND

BND tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.3% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, measured by the closely related Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 6, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

ILF

ILF tracks an index of Latin America 40. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 46 positions, with the top ten at 55.6%. It sat 13.7% below its high of Oct 12, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BND or ILF?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned −1.3% and ILF +17.2%.
Which is cheaper, BND or ILF?
BND is cheaper, by 0.44 percentage points a year. That is about $44 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BND against ILF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-ilf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.