Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

ILF vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ILF returned +17.2% to TLT's −7.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ILF and TLT

Net assets: $3.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Latin America 40 ETF, and $47.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.

At a glance
+17.2%
ILF total return, 1 year
−7.9%
TLT total return, 1 year
0.47%
ILF expense ratio
0.15%
TLT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

TLT costs 0.32 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 25.1 points; TLT is 13.5 times larger.

ILF vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureILFTLT
Return
Total return, 1 year+17.2%−7.9%
Drawdown
Below its high13.7%, high on Oct 12, 202642.6%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P Latin America 40ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.47%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$3.5bn$47.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund55.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, ILF and TLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ILF TLT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in ILF
NU HOLDINGS CLASS A 7.53%
PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG PRE 6.95%
ITAU UNIBANCO HOLDING ADR REP PRE 6.61%
PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG SA 6.61%
VALE ADR REPRESENTING ONE 6.45%
GRUPO MEXICO B 6.26%
GPO FINANCE BANORTE 4.48%
CREDICORP LTD 3.96%
Only in TLT
TREASURY BOND 4.32%
TREASURY BOND 4.12%
TREASURY BOND (OLD) 4.07%
TREASURY BOND 4.02%
TREASURY BOND 3.93%
TREASURY BOND 3.92%
TREASURY BOND 3.89%
TREASURY BOND 3.88%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

ILF iShares Latin America 40 ETF TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Latin America 40 Tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries
Total return, 1 year +17.2% −7.9%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −7.8% (BBLB)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.1 pts vs BBLB
Expense ratio 0.47% 0.15%
Holdings 46 47
Net assets, ILF as of Oct 28, 2026 and TLT as of Oct 27, 2026 $3.5bn $47.4bn

ILF and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

ILF and TLT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ILF

ILF tracks an index of Latin America 40. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 46 positions, with the top ten at 55.6%. It sat 13.7% below its high of Oct 12, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

TLT

TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −7.9% with distributions reinvested, against −7.8% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.6% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ILF or TLT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILF returned +17.2% and TLT −7.9%.
Which is cheaper, ILF or TLT?
TLT is cheaper, by 0.32 percentage points a year. That is about $32 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ILF against TLT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilf-vs-tlt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.