Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
EWT vs FBCG: how they differ
EWT and FBCG hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWT returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EWT and FBCG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in EWT | Only in FBCG |
|---|---|
| TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 22.07% | NVIDIA CORP 14.62% |
| MEDIATEK 7.03% | APPLE INC 9.64% |
| DELTA ELECTRONICS 3.53% | ALPHABET INC 9.10% |
| HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 3.28% | AMAZON.COM INC 8.43% |
| ASE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING 2.79% | MICROSOFT CORP 5.20% |
| UNITED MICRO ELECTRONICS CORP 2.09% | META PLATFORMS INC 3.90% |
| ELITE MATERIAL 2.08% | BROADCOM INC 3.74% |
| NAN YA PLASTICS CORP 2.04% | ELI LILLY and CO 2.25% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Fidelity |
| What it is | MSCI Taiwan | Blue Chip Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +84.9% | +17.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +67.4 pts | −0.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.57% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 86.8% |
| Holdings | 78 | 214 |
EWT in plain words
EWT is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +84.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 48.6%.
FBCG in plain words
FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EWT or FBCG?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +84.9% and FBCG returned +17.3%, so EWT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, EWT or FBCG?
- EWT charges 0.59% a year and FBCG charges 0.57%, so FBCG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do EWT and FBCG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWT and 87% of FBCG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EWT against FBCG, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-fbcg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources