Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FXI vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FXI returned −19.1% to PULS's +4.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FXI and PULS
Net assets: $3.7bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares China Large-Cap ETF, and $19.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
PULS costs 0.58 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 23.1 points; PULS is 5.4 times larger.
| Measure | FXI | PULS |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −19.1% | +4.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 32.7%, high on Feb 17, 2021 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | FTSE China 50 Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.73% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026 | $3.7bn | $19.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 58.4% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FXI and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FXI and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FXI
FXI tracks an index of China Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −19.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 58.4%. It sat 32.7% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.
PULS
PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FXI or PULS?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXI returned −19.1% and PULS +4.0%.
- Which is cheaper, FXI or PULS?
- PULS is cheaper, by 0.58 percentage points a year. That is about $58 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FXI against PULS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fxi-vs-puls
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FXI against PULS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fxi-vs-puls
[FXI against PULS (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fxi-vs-puls)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.