Which returned more over the last year, FXI or PULS?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXI returned −13.8% and PULS returned +4.2%, so PULS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, FXI or PULS?

FXI charges 0.73% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FXI vs PULS: how they differ

FXI and PULS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PULS returned more over the year.

iShares China Large-Cap ETF and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FXI and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FXI	Only in PULS
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 9.88%	PGIM ETF Trust 2.38%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 9.14%	GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.98%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 8.34%	Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.87%
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF 6.56%	ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.75%
XIAOMI 4.83%	BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.68%
MEITUAN 4.36%	FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUE 0.67%
BANK OF CHINA LTD H 4.32%	BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.56%
PING AN INSURANCE (GROUP) CO OF CH 3.80%	BROADCOM INC 0.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

FXI and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF	PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	PGIM
What it is	China Large-Cap	PGIM Ultra Short Bond
Total return, 1 year	−13.8%	+4.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−31.3 pts	−13.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.73%	0.15%
Holdings	53	553

FXI in plain words

FXI is an index equity fund tracking the China Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%. It sat 28.5% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

PULS in plain words

PULS is a cash and treasury bills tracking the PGIM Ultra Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FXI or PULS?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXI returned −13.8% and PULS returned +4.2%, so PULS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FXI or PULS?: FXI charges 0.73% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FXI against PULS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FXI against PULS, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fxi-vs-puls Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources