Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FXI vs SPYM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FXI returned −19.1% to SPYM's +13.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FXI and SPYM

Net assets: $3.7bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares China Large-Cap ETF, and $185.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF.

At a glance
−19.1%
FXI total return, 1 year
+13.7%
SPYM total return, 1 year
0.73%
FXI expense ratio
0.02%
SPYM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SPYM costs 0.71 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 32.8 points; SPYM is far larger, $183.4bn against $3.7bn.

FXI vs SPYM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFXISPYM
Return
Total return, 1 year−19.1%+13.7%
Drawdown
Below its high32.7%, high on Feb 17, 2021
Benchmark
What it tracksFTSE China 50 IndexS&P 500 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.73%0.02%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026$3.7bn$183.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund58.4%38.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FXI and SPYM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FXI SPYM
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FXI
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 9.81%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 8.63%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 8.60%
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF 6.69%
XIAOMI 4.86%
BANK OF CHINA LTD H 4.76%
MEITUAN 4.58%
NETEASE 3.85%
Only in SPYM
NVIDIA CORP 7.92%
APPLE INC 7.61%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.92%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.73%
ALPHABET INC CL A 2.83%
BROADCOM INC 2.44%
ALPHABET INC CL C 2.26%
META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A 2.05%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of China Large-Cap Tracks the S&P 500
Total return, 1 year −19.1% +13.7%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark not measured 0.0 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.73% 0.02%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 99.8%
Holdings 51 506
Net assets, FXI as of Oct 28, 2026 and SPYM as of Oct 27, 2026 $3.7bn $185.0bn
Former ticker none SPLG

FXI and SPYM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

FXI and SPYM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FXI

FXI tracks an index of China Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −19.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 58.4%. It sat 32.7% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.

SPYM

SPYM tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.02% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FXI or SPYM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXI returned −19.1% and SPYM +13.7%.
Which is cheaper, FXI or SPYM?
SPYM is cheaper, by 0.71 percentage points a year. That is about $71 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FXI and SPYM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of FXI and 100% of SPYM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FXI against SPYM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fxi-vs-spym

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.