Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FXI vs IXUS: how they differ

FXI and IXUS hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and IXUS returned more over the year.

iShares China Large-Cap ETF and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FXI and IXUS hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FXI and IXUS both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFXIIXUS
TENCENT HOLDINGS8.34%0.78%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING9.14%0.53%
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H9.88%0.24%
XIAOMI4.83%0.13%
BANK OF CHINA LTD H4.32%0.12%
MEITUAN4.36%0.11%
PING AN INSURANCE (GROUP) CO OF CH3.80%0.10%
NETEASE3.56%0.09%
BYD H3.14%0.08%
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY0.08%0.09%
JD.COM CLASS A2.78%0.07%
CHINA LIFE INSURANCE LTD H2.41%0.06%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FXIOnly in IXUS
JIANGSU HENGRUI PHARMACEUTICALS LT 0.11%TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 4.49%
GIGADEVICE SEMICONDUCTOR INC CLASS 0.10%SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 2.21%
CHINA EVERBRIGHT BANK LTD H 0.09%SK HYNIX 1.79%
S.F. HOLDING LTD CLASS H 0.08%ASML HOLDING 1.55%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.84%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 0.70%
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.68%
SHELL PLC 0.62%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

FXI and IXUS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isChina Large-CapCore MSCI Total International Stock
Total return, 1 year−13.8%+22.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−31.3 pts+4.7 pts
Expense ratio0.73%0.07%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.0%
Holdings532540

FXI in plain words

FXI is an index equity fund tracking the China Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%. It sat 28.5% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

IXUS in plain words

IXUS is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI Total International Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2540 positions, with the top ten at 14.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FXI or IXUS?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXI returned −13.8% and IXUS returned +22.2%, so IXUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FXI or IXUS?
FXI charges 0.73% a year and IXUS charges 0.07%, so IXUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FXI and IXUS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of FXI and 0% of IXUS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FXI against IXUS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FXI against IXUS, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fxi-vs-ixus Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources