Which returned more over the last year, FXI or SIVR?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXI returned −13.8% and SIVR returned +54.2%, so SIVR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, FXI or SIVR?

FXI charges 0.73% a year and SIVR charges 0.45%, so SIVR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FXI vs SIVR: how they differ

FXI is an equity index fund and SIVR a commodity fund, and over the year SIVR returned more, +54.2% against −13.8%.

iShares China Large-Cap ETF and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF.

FXI and SIVR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF	SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	abrdn
What it is	China Large-Cap	Physical Silver
Total return, 1 year	−13.8%	+54.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−31.3 pts	+36.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.73%	0.45%
Holdings	53	not filed

FXI in plain words

FXI is an index equity fund tracking the China Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%. It sat 28.5% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

SIVR in plain words

SIVR is a commodity fund tracking the Physical Silver. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +54.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.45% a year. It sat 44.9% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FXI or SIVR?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXI returned −13.8% and SIVR returned +54.2%, so SIVR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FXI or SIVR?: FXI charges 0.73% a year and SIVR charges 0.45%, so SIVR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FXI against SIVR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FXI against SIVR, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fxi-vs-sivr Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources