Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FXI vs MINT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FXI returned −19.1% to MINT's +4.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FXI and MINT

Net assets: $3.7bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares China Large-Cap ETF, and $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund.

At a glance
−19.1%
FXI total return, 1 year
+4.2%
MINT total return, 1 year
0.73%
FXI expense ratio
0.36%
MINT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MINT costs 0.37 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 23.3 points.

FXI vs MINT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFXIMINT
Return
Total return, 1 year−19.1%+4.2%
Drawdown
Below its high32.7%, high on Feb 17, 2021
Benchmark
What it tracksFTSE China 50 IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.73%0.36%
Net assets, FXI as of Oct 28, 2026 and MINT as of Jun 30, 2026$3.7bn$16.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund58.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FXI and MINT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FXI MINT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FXI
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 9.81%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 8.63%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 8.60%
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF 6.69%
XIAOMI 4.86%
BANK OF CHINA LTD H 4.76%
MEITUAN 4.58%
NETEASE 3.85%
Only in MINT
United States Treasury 6.21%
Fannie Mae 1.12%
Freddie Mac 0.99%
SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.87%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.77%
AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.77%
Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.71%
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.70%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
Issuer iShares PIMCO
What it is Tracks an index of China Large-Cap Actively managed
Total return, 1 year −19.1% +4.2%
Expense ratio 0.73% 0.36%
Holdings 51 977
Net assets, FXI as of Oct 28, 2026 and MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 $3.7bn $16.4bn

FXI and MINT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

FXI flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FXI

FXI tracks an index of China Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −19.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 58.4%. It sat 32.7% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.

MINT

MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FXI or MINT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXI returned −19.1% and MINT +4.2%.
Which is cheaper, FXI or MINT?
MINT is cheaper, by 0.37 percentage points a year. That is about $37 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FXI against MINT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fxi-vs-mint

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.