Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWT vs MINT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWT returned +69.9% to MINT's +4.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWT and MINT

Net assets: $12.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF, and $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund.

At a glance
+69.9%
EWT total return, 1 year
+4.2%
MINT total return, 1 year
0.59%
EWT expense ratio
0.36%
MINT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MINT costs 0.23 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 65.7 points.

EWT vs MINT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWTMINT
Return
Total return, 1 year+69.9%+4.2%
Drawdown
Below its high7.7%, high on Oct 5, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Taiwan 25/50 IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.36%
Net assets, EWT as of Oct 28, 2026 and MINT as of Jun 30, 2026$12.0bn$16.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund47.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EWT and MINT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWT MINT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWT
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 22.12%
MEDIATEK 6.03%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 3.31%
DELTA ELECTRONICS 3.25%
ASE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING 2.86%
NAN YA PLASTICS CORP 2.54%
UNIMICRON TECHNOLOGY 2.04%
ELITE MATERIAL 1.88%
Only in MINT
United States Treasury 6.21%
Fannie Mae 1.12%
Freddie Mac 0.99%
SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.87%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.77%
AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.77%
Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.71%
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.70%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
Issuer iShares PIMCO
What it is Tracks the MSCI Taiwan Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +69.9% +4.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.3% (EEM) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +53.6 pts vs EEM not measured
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.36%
Holdings 79 977
Net assets, EWT as of Oct 28, 2026 and MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 $12.0bn $16.4bn

EWT and MINT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EWT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWT

EWT tracks the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +69.9% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 79 positions, with the top ten at 47.7%. It sat 7.7% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MINT

MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWT or MINT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +69.9% and MINT +4.2%.
Which is cheaper, EWT or MINT?
MINT is cheaper, by 0.23 percentage points a year. That is about $23 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWT against MINT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-mint

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.