Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
EWT vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWT returned +69.9% to PULS's +4.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about EWT and PULS
Net assets: $12.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF, and $19.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
PULS costs 0.44 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 65.9 points; PULS is 1.7 times larger.
| Measure | EWT | PULS |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +69.9% | +4.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 7.7%, high on Oct 5, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $11.8bn | $19.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 47.7% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, EWT and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
EWT and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EWT
EWT tracks the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +69.9% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 79 positions, with the top ten at 47.7%. It sat 7.7% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
PULS
PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EWT or PULS?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +69.9% and PULS +4.0%.
- Which is cheaper, EWT or PULS?
- PULS is cheaper, by 0.44 percentage points a year. That is about $44 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, EWT against PULS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-puls
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). EWT against PULS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-puls
[EWT against PULS (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-puls)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.