Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FLKR vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FLKR returned +79.7% to PULS's +4.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FLKR and PULS
Net assets: $1.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF, and $19.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
FLKR costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 75.7 points; PULS is 11.6 times larger.
| Measure | FLKR | PULS |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +79.7% | +4.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 24.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.09% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026 | $1.7bn | $19.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 64.6% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FLKR and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FLKR and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FLKR
FLKR tracks the FTSE South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 156 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 24.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
PULS
PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FLKR or PULS?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLKR returned +79.7% and PULS +4.0%.
- Which is cheaper, FLKR or PULS?
- FLKR is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FLKR against PULS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flkr-vs-puls
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FLKR against PULS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flkr-vs-puls
[FLKR against PULS (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flkr-vs-puls)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.