Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FLKR vs SHV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FLKR returned +79.7% to SHV's +3.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FLKR and SHV
Net assets: $1.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF, and $21.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
FLKR costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 76.1 points; SHV is 13.1 times larger.
| Measure | FLKR | SHV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +79.7% | +3.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 24.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index | ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.09% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026 | $1.7bn | $22.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 64.6% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FLKR and SHV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FLKR and SHV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FLKR
FLKR tracks the FTSE South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 156 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 24.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
SHV
SHV tracks an index of 0-1 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FLKR or SHV?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLKR returned +79.7% and SHV +3.6%.
- Which is cheaper, FLKR or SHV?
- FLKR is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FLKR against SHV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flkr-vs-shv
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FLKR against SHV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flkr-vs-shv
[FLKR against SHV (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flkr-vs-shv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.