Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWY vs SHV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWY returned +79.7% to SHV's +3.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWY and SHV

Net assets: $24.4bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF, and $21.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF.

At a glance
+79.7%
EWY total return, 1 year
+3.6%
SHV total return, 1 year
0.59%
EWY expense ratio
0.15%
SHV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SHV costs 0.44 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 76.1 points.

EWY vs SHV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWYSHV
Return
Total return, 1 year+79.7%+3.6%
Drawdown
Below its high24.3%, high on Jun 18, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Korea 25/50 Daily 25 Capped IndexICE Short US Treasury Securities Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026$22.5bn$22.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund60.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EWY and SHV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWY SHV
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWY
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 23.14%
SK HYNIX 23.11%
SK SQUARE 2.78%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS LTD 2.67%
KB FINANCIAL GROUP 2.06%
SHINHAN FINANCIAL GROUP 1.54%
HYUNDAI MOTOR 1.51%
HANA FINANCIAL GROUP 1.39%
Only in SHV
TREASURY BILL 4.98%
TREASURY BILL 4.17%
TREASURY BILL 3.90%
TREASURY BILL 3.72%
TREASURY BILL 3.58%
TREASURY BILL 3.48%
TREASURY BILL 3.35%
TREASURY BILL 3.31%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI South Korea Tracks an index of 0-1 Year Treasury Bond
Total return, 1 year +79.7% +3.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.3% (EEM) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +63.4 pts vs EEM not measured
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.15%
Holdings 78 66
Net assets, EWY as of Oct 28, 2026 and SHV as of Oct 27, 2026 $24.4bn $21.7bn

EWY and SHV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EWY and SHV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWY

EWY tracks the MSCI South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 60.9%. It sat 24.3% below its high of Jun 18, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SHV

SHV tracks an index of 0-1 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWY or SHV?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWY returned +79.7% and SHV +3.6%.
Which is cheaper, EWY or SHV?
SHV is cheaper, by 0.44 percentage points a year. That is about $44 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWY against SHV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewy-vs-shv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.