Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PULS vs VT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PULS returned +4.0% to VT's +13.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PULS and VT

Net assets: $19.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF, and $81.8bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total World Stock Index ETF.

At a glance
+4.0%
PULS total return, 1 year
+13.5%
VT total return, 1 year
0.15%
PULS expense ratio
0.06%
VT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VT costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.5 points.

PULS vs VT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePULSVT
Return
Total return, 1 year+4.0%+13.5%
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedFTSE Global All Cap Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.06%
Net assets, PULS as of Oct 27, 2026 and VT as of Sep 30, 2026$19.8bn$81.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight55%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund22.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PULS and VT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PULS VT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PULS
PGIM ETF Trust 1.81%
GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.74%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.66%
ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.57%
BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.51%
FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUEBEC 0.51%
BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.43%
BROADCOM INC 0.43%
Only in VT
NVIDIA Corp 4.54%
Apple Inc 4.11%
Microsoft Corp 3.25%
Amazon.com Inc 2.06%
Alphabet Inc 1.73%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 1.62%
Broadcom Inc 1.39%
Meta Platforms Inc 1.36%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF VT Vanguard Total World Stock Index ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
Issuer PGIM Vanguard
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Total World Stock
Total return, 1 year +4.0% +13.5%
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.06%
Holdings 553 10194
Net assets, PULS as of Oct 27, 2026 and VT as of Sep 30, 2026 $19.8bn $81.8bn

PULS and VT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

PULS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PULS

PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

VT

VT tracks an index of Total World Stock. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10,194 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PULS or VT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.0% and VT +13.5%.
Which is cheaper, PULS or VT?
VT is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PULS against VT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-vt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.