Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PULS vs VWO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PULS returned +4.0% to VWO's +4.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PULS and VWO

Net assets: $19.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF, and $125.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF.

At a glance
+4.0%
PULS total return, 1 year
+4.8%
VWO total return, 1 year
0.15%
PULS expense ratio
0.06%
VWO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VWO costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.8 points.

PULS vs VWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePULSVWO
Return
Total return, 1 year+4.0%+4.8%
Drawdown
Below its high7.0%, high on Sep 4, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedFTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.06%
Net assets, PULS as of Oct 27, 2026 and VWO as of Sep 30, 2026$19.8bn$125.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund29.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PULS and VWO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PULS VWO
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PULS
PGIM ETF Trust 1.81%
GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.74%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.66%
ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.57%
BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.51%
FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUEBEC 0.51%
BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.43%
BROADCOM INC 0.43%
Only in VWO
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 15.76%
SLCMT1142 2.96%
Tencent Holdings Ltd 2.82%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 2.11%
MediaTek Inc 1.88%
MKTLIQ 0.95%
Delta Electronics Inc 0.95%
China Construction Bank Corp 0.91%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
Issuer PGIM Vanguard
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Emerging markets
Total return, 1 year +4.0% +4.8%
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.06%
Holdings 553 6515
Net assets, PULS as of Oct 27, 2026 and VWO as of Sep 30, 2026 $19.8bn $125.4bn

PULS and VWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

PULS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PULS

PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

VWO

VWO tracks an index of Emerging markets. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 6,515 positions, with the top ten at 29.8%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PULS or VWO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.0% and VWO +4.8%.
Which is cheaper, PULS or VWO?
VWO is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PULS against VWO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-vwo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.