Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EEM vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EEM returned +16.3% to PULS's +4.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EEM and PULS

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $29.1bn for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and $19.8bn for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.

At a glance
+16.3%
EEM total return, 1 year
+4.0%
PULS total return, 1 year
0.72%
EEM expense ratio
0.15%
PULS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

PULS costs 0.57 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.3 points; EEM is 1.5 times larger.

EEM vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEEMPULS
Return
Total return, 1 year+16.3%+4.0%
Drawdown
Below its high10.8%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Emerging Markets IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.72%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$29.1bn$19.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund37.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EEM and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EEM PULS
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EEM
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 15.98%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 6.88%
SK HYNIX 4.91%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 2.64%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 1.82%
MEDIATEK 1.54%
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 0.94%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 0.91%
Only in PULS
PGIM ETF Trust 1.81%
GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.74%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.66%
ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.57%
BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.51%
FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUEBEC 0.51%
BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.43%
BROADCOM INC 0.43%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
Issuer iShares PGIM
What it is Tracks an index of Emerging markets Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +16.3% +4.0%
Expense ratio 0.72% 0.15%
Holdings 1186 553
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $29.1bn $19.8bn

EEM and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EEM and PULS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EEM

EEM tracks an index of Emerging markets. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,186 positions, with the top ten at 37.2%. It sat 10.8% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

PULS

PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EEM or PULS?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EEM returned +16.3% and PULS +4.0%.
Which is cheaper, EEM or PULS?
PULS is cheaper, by 0.57 percentage points a year. That is about $57 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EEM against PULS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eem-vs-puls

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.