Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FXI vs LQD: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FXI returned −19.1% to LQD's −3.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FXI and LQD

Net assets: $3.7bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares China Large-Cap ETF, and $30.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF.

At a glance
−19.1%
FXI total return, 1 year
−3.4%
LQD total return, 1 year
0.73%
FXI expense ratio
0.14%
LQD expense ratio

Pair scorecard

LQD costs 0.59 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.7 points; LQD is 8.2 times larger.

FXI vs LQD: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFXILQD
Return
Total return, 1 year−19.1%−3.4%
Drawdown
Below its high32.7%, high on Feb 17, 20216.3%, high on Sep 22, 2021
Benchmark
What it tracksFTSE China 50 IndexMarkit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.73%0.14%
Net assets, as of Oct 23, 2026$3.7bn$30.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund58.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FXI and LQD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FXI LQD
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FXI
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 9.81%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 8.63%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 8.60%
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF 6.69%
XIAOMI 4.86%
BANK OF CHINA LTD H 4.76%
MEITUAN 4.58%
NETEASE 3.85%
Only in LQD
ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES LLC 0.20%
CVS HEALTH CORP 0.17%
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES COR 144A 0.16%
T-MOBILE USA INC 0.16%
AMAZON.COM INC 0.14%
BOEING CO 0.14%
CITIGROUP INC 0.14%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 0.14%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index of China Large-Cap Tracks an index of US investment grade bonds
Total return, 1 year −19.1% −3.4%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −1.2% (IUSB)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −2.2 pts vs IUSB
Expense ratio 0.73% 0.14%
Holdings 51 3191
Net assets, FXI as of Oct 28, 2026 and LQD as of Oct 27, 2026 $3.7bn $30.6bn

FXI and LQD on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

FXI and LQD flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FXI

FXI tracks an index of China Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −19.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 58.4%. It sat 32.7% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.

LQD

LQD tracks an index of US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.3% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FXI or LQD?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXI returned −19.1% and LQD −3.4%.
Which is cheaper, FXI or LQD?
LQD is cheaper, by 0.59 percentage points a year. That is about $59 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FXI against LQD, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fxi-vs-lqd

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.