Which returned more over the last year, EWT or LQD?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +84.9% and LQD returned −2.7%, so EWT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EWT or LQD?

EWT charges 0.59% a year and LQD charges 0.14%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EWT vs LQD: how they differ

EWT and LQD hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWT returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EWT and LQD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EWT	Only in LQD
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 22.07%	BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.88%
MEDIATEK 7.03%	ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES LLC 0.12%
DELTA ELECTRONICS 3.53%	DEUTSCHE TELEKOM INTERNATIONAL FIN 0.11%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 3.28%	CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING L 144A 0.10%
ASE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING 2.79%	JPMORGAN CHASE & CO MTN 0.09%
UNITED MICRO ELECTRONICS CORP 2.09%	BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC 0.08%
ELITE MATERIAL 2.08%	MORGAN STANLEY (FXD-FRN) MTN 0.08%
NAN YA PLASTICS CORP 2.04%	CITIGROUP INC (FX-FRN) 0.07%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

EWT and LQD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF	LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	MSCI Taiwan	US investment grade bonds
Total return, 1 year	+84.9%	−2.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+67.4 pts	−20.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.59%	0.14%
Holdings	78	3149

EWT in plain words

EWT is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +84.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 48.6%.

LQD in plain words

LQD is a bond fund tracking the US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWT or LQD?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +84.9% and LQD returned −2.7%, so EWT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EWT or LQD?: EWT charges 0.59% a year and LQD charges 0.14%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EWT against LQD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EWT against LQD, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-lqd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources