Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWT vs LQD: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWT returned +69.9% to LQD's −3.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWT and LQD

Net assets: $12.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF, and $30.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF.

At a glance
+69.9%
EWT total return, 1 year
−3.4%
LQD total return, 1 year
0.59%
EWT expense ratio
0.14%
LQD expense ratio

Pair scorecard

LQD costs 0.45 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 73.3 points; LQD is 2.6 times larger.

EWT vs LQD: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWTLQD
Return
Total return, 1 year+69.9%−3.4%
Drawdown
Below its high7.7%, high on Oct 5, 20266.3%, high on Sep 22, 2021
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Taiwan 25/50 IndexMarkit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.14%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$11.8bn$30.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund47.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EWT and LQD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWT LQD
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWT
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 22.12%
MEDIATEK 6.03%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 3.31%
DELTA ELECTRONICS 3.25%
ASE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING 2.86%
NAN YA PLASTICS CORP 2.54%
UNIMICRON TECHNOLOGY 2.04%
ELITE MATERIAL 1.88%
Only in LQD
ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES LLC 0.20%
CVS HEALTH CORP 0.17%
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES COR 144A 0.16%
T-MOBILE USA INC 0.16%
AMAZON.COM INC 0.14%
BOEING CO 0.14%
CITIGROUP INC 0.14%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 0.14%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Taiwan Tracks an index of US investment grade bonds
Total return, 1 year +69.9% −3.4%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.3% (EEM) −1.2% (IUSB)
Gap to its benchmark +53.6 pts vs EEM −2.2 pts vs IUSB
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.14%
Holdings 79 3191
Net assets, EWT as of Oct 28, 2026 and LQD as of Oct 27, 2026 $12.0bn $30.6bn

EWT and LQD on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EWT and LQD flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWT

EWT tracks the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +69.9% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 79 positions, with the top ten at 47.7%. It sat 7.7% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

LQD

LQD tracks an index of US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.3% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWT or LQD?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +69.9% and LQD −3.4%.
Which is cheaper, EWT or LQD?
LQD is cheaper, by 0.45 percentage points a year. That is about $45 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWT against LQD, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-lqd

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.