Which returned more over the last year, LQD or VPL?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −2.7% and VPL returned +36.9%, so VPL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, LQD or VPL?

LQD charges 0.14% a year and VPL charges 0.07%, so VPL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

LQD vs VPL: how they differ

LQD and VPL hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VPL returned more over the year.

iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF and Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, LQD and VPL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in LQD	Only in VPL
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.88%	Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 6.06%
ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES LLC 0.12%	SK hynix Inc 4.12%
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM INTERNATIONAL FIN 0.11%	Commonwealth Bank of Australia 1.80%
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING L 144A 0.10%	Toyota Motor Corp 1.74%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO MTN 0.09%	Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 1.69%
BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC 0.08%	BHP Group Ltd 1.66%
MORGAN STANLEY (FXD-FRN) MTN 0.08%	Hitachi Ltd 1.18%
CITIGROUP INC (FX-FRN) 0.07%	Advantest Corp 1.16%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

LQD and VPL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	VPL Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	US investment grade bonds	Pacific Stock
Total return, 1 year	−2.7%	+36.9%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−20.2 pts	+19.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.14%	0.07%
Holdings	3149	2335

LQD in plain words

LQD is a bond fund tracking the US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

VPL in plain words

VPL is an index equity fund tracking the Pacific Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +36.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2335 positions, with the top ten at 21.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, LQD or VPL?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −2.7% and VPL returned +36.9%, so VPL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, LQD or VPL?: LQD charges 0.14% a year and VPL charges 0.07%, so VPL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

LQD against VPL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, LQD against VPL, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lqd-vs-vpl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources