Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGDV vs FXI: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGDV returned +15.8% to FXI's −19.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGDV and FXI

Net assets: $39.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF, and $3.7bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares China Large-Cap ETF.

At a glance
+15.8%
CGDV total return, 1 year
−19.1%
FXI total return, 1 year
0.33%
CGDV expense ratio
0.73%
FXI expense ratio

Pair scorecard

CGDV costs 0.40 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 34.9 points; CGDV is 10.5 times larger.

CGDV vs FXI: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGDVFXI
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.8%−19.1%
Drawdown
Below its high3.6%, high on Aug 13, 202632.7%, high on Feb 17, 2021
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedFTSE China 50 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.33%0.73%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026$38.9bn$3.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.0%58.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and FXI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGDV FXI
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGDV
Microsoft Corp 7.64%
NVIDIA Corp 6.32%
Broadcom Inc 4.67%
Meta Platforms Inc 4.27%
Alphabet Inc 3.55%
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 3.49%
Oracle Corp 3.22%
RTX Corp 3.16%
Only in FXI
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 9.81%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 8.63%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 8.60%
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF 6.69%
XIAOMI 4.86%
BANK OF CHINA LTD H 4.76%
MEITUAN 4.58%
NETEASE 3.85%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of China Large-Cap
Total return, 1 year +15.8% −19.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +27.5% (IWD) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −11.7 pts vs IWD not measured
Expense ratio 0.33% 0.73%
Already in the S&P 500 91.7% 0.0%
Holdings 53 51
Net assets, CGDV as of Oct 27, 2026 and FXI as of Oct 28, 2026 $39.1bn $3.7bn

CGDV and FXI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

FXI flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGDV

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

FXI

FXI tracks an index of China Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −19.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 58.4%. It sat 32.7% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or FXI?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +15.8% and FXI −19.1%.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or FXI?
CGDV is cheaper, by 0.40 percentage points a year. That is about $40 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGDV and FXI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of CGDV and 0% of FXI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGDV against FXI, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-fxi

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.