Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGDV vs EWT: how they differ

CGDV and EWT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWT returned more over the year.

Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and EWT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGDVOnly in EWT
Microsoft Corp 5.81%TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 22.07%
NVIDIA Corp 5.66%MEDIATEK 7.03%
Broadcom Inc 5.16%DELTA ELECTRONICS 3.53%
Alphabet Inc 3.60%HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 3.28%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.33%ASE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING 2.79%
Eli Lilly & Co 3.15%UNITED MICRO ELECTRONICS CORP 2.09%
Applied Materials Inc 3.12%ELITE MATERIAL 2.08%
General Electric Co 3.08%NAN YA PLASTICS CORP 2.04%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

CGDV and EWT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerCapital GroupiShares
What it isDividend ValueMSCI Taiwan
Total return, 1 year+18.7%+84.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.2 pts+67.4 pts
Expense ratio0.33%0.59%
Already in the S&P 50091.0%0.0%
Holdings5378

CGDV in plain words

CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

EWT in plain words

EWT is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +84.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 48.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or EWT?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and EWT returned +84.9%, so EWT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or EWT?
CGDV charges 0.33% a year and EWT charges 0.59%, so CGDV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGDV and EWT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of CGDV and 0% of EWT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGDV against EWT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGDV against EWT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-ewt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources