Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

DGRO vs EWT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, DGRO returned +18.8% to EWT's +69.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DGRO and EWT

Net assets: $44.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF, and $12.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF.

At a glance
+18.8%
DGRO total return, 1 year
+69.9%
EWT total return, 1 year
0.08%
DGRO expense ratio
0.59%
EWT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

DGRO costs 0.51 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 51.1 points; DGRO is 3.8 times larger.

DGRO vs EWT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureDGROEWT
Return
Total return, 1 year+18.8%+69.9%
Drawdown
Below its high7.7%, high on Oct 5, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMorningstar US Dividend Growth IndexMSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.08%0.59%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$44.6bn$11.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund27.2%47.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and EWT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DGRO EWT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in DGRO
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 3.24%
MICROSOFT 3.14%
APPLE 3.11%
ABBVIE 3.00%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.77%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2.68%
BROADCOM INC 2.55%
PROCTER & GAMBLE 2.42%
Only in EWT
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 22.12%
MEDIATEK 6.03%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 3.31%
DELTA ELECTRONICS 3.25%
ASE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING 2.86%
NAN YA PLASTICS CORP 2.54%
UNIMICRON TECHNOLOGY 2.04%
ELITE MATERIAL 1.88%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Dividend Growth Tracks the MSCI Taiwan
Total return, 1 year +18.8% +69.9%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +16.3% (EEM)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +53.6 pts vs EEM
Expense ratio 0.08% 0.59%
Already in the S&P 500 91.8% 0.0%
Holdings 393 79
Net assets, DGRO as of Oct 27, 2026 and EWT as of Oct 28, 2026 $44.6bn $12.0bn

DGRO and EWT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

DGRO and EWT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
DGRO

DGRO tracks an index of Dividend Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 393 positions, with the top ten at 27.2%.

EWT

EWT tracks the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +69.9% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 79 positions, with the top ten at 47.7%. It sat 7.7% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or EWT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +18.8% and EWT +69.9%.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or EWT?
DGRO is cheaper, by 0.51 percentage points a year. That is about $51 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and EWT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of DGRO and 0% of EWT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DGRO against EWT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgro-vs-ewt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.