Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGDV vs ILF: how they differ
CGDV and ILF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ILF returned more over the year.
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and iShares Latin America 40 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and ILF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CGDV | Only in ILF |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Corp 5.81% | NU HOLDINGS CLASS A 8.61% |
| NVIDIA Corp 5.66% | VALE ADR REPRESENTING ONE 8.00% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.16% | ITAU UNIBANCO HOLDING ADR REP PRE 6.71% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.60% | PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG PRE 6.33% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 3.33% | GRUPO MEXICO B 6.02% |
| Eli Lilly & Co 3.15% | PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG SA 5.94% |
| Applied Materials Inc 3.12% | GPO FINANCE BANORTE 4.24% |
| General Electric Co 3.08% | CREDICORP LTD 3.85% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | ILF iShares Latin America 40 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital Group | iShares |
| What it is | Dividend Value | Latin America 40 |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.7% | +33.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.2 pts | +15.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.47% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 53 | 47 |
CGDV in plain words
CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
ILF in plain words
ILF is an index equity fund tracking the Latin America 40. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +33.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 47 positions, with the top ten at 55.7%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Apr 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or ILF?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and ILF returned +33.4%, so ILF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGDV or ILF?
- CGDV charges 0.33% a year and ILF charges 0.47%, so CGDV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGDV and ILF overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 91% of CGDV and 0% of ILF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGDV against ILF, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-ilf Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources