Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
ILF vs IWD: how they differ
ILF and IWD hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ILF returned more over the year.
iShares Latin America 40 ETF and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ILF and IWD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | ILF | IWD |
|---|---|---|
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY | 0.31% | 0.13% |
| USD CASH | 0.53% | 0.12% |
| SOUTHERN COPPER CORP | 2.45% | 0.04% |
| MILLICOM INTERNATIONAL CELLULAR | 1.40% | 0.02% |
| Only in ILF | Only in IWD |
|---|---|
| NU HOLDINGS CLASS A 8.61% | AMAZON.COM INC 6.04% |
| VALE ADR REPRESENTING ONE 8.00% | APPLE 5.83% |
| ITAU UNIBANCO HOLDING ADR REP PRE 6.71% | MICROSOFT 4.93% |
| PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG PRE 6.33% | BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 2.54% |
| GRUPO MEXICO B 6.02% | JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2.54% |
| PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG SA 5.94% | EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.85% |
| GPO FINANCE BANORTE 4.24% | JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.73% |
| CREDICORP LTD 3.85% | INTEL CORPORATION 1.23% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| ILF iShares Latin America 40 ETF | IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Latin America 40 | Russell 1000 value |
| Total return, 1 year | +33.4% | +27.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +15.9 pts | +9.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.47% | 0.18% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 90.2% |
| Holdings | 47 | 814 |
ILF in plain words
ILF is an index equity fund tracking the Latin America 40. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +33.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 47 positions, with the top ten at 55.7%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Apr 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IWD in plain words
IWD is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 814 positions, with the top ten at 29.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ILF or IWD?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILF returned +33.4% and IWD returned +27.4%, so ILF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, ILF or IWD?
- ILF charges 0.47% a year and IWD charges 0.18%, so IWD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do ILF and IWD overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of ILF and 90% of IWD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ILF against IWD, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilf-vs-iwd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources