Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
ACWI vs IWD: how they differ
ACWI and IWD hold 40% of their weight in the same names, and IWD returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and IWD hold 40% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | ACWI | IWD |
|---|---|---|
| APPLE | 4.67% | 5.83% |
| MICROSOFT | 3.38% | 4.93% |
| AMAZON.COM INC | 2.38% | 6.04% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO | 0.92% | 2.54% |
| BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B | 0.69% | 2.54% |
| META PLATFORMS CLASS A | 1.38% | 0.69% |
| EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP | 0.67% | 1.85% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON | 0.62% | 1.73% |
| WALMART INC | 0.45% | 1.14% |
| ABBVIE | 0.44% | 1.12% |
| INTEL CORPORATION | 0.43% | 1.23% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS INC | 0.41% | 1.14% |
| Only in ACWI | Only in IWD |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA 4.89% | MODERNA 0.13% |
| ALPHABET CLASS A 1.90% | USD CASH 0.12% |
| TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 1.86% | ROYAL GOLD 0.06% |
| BROADCOM INC 1.59% | TENET HEALTHCARE CORP 0.06% |
| ALPHABET CLASS C 1.50% | US FOODS HOLDING 0.06% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.08% | EAST WEST BANCORP 0.05% |
| TESLA INC 1.02% | ITT INC 0.05% |
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 0.91% | NUTANIX CLASS A 0.05% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | MSCI ACWI | Russell 1000 value |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.1% | +27.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.6 pts | +9.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.18% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 61.4% | 90.2% |
| Holdings | 1630 | 814 |
ACWI in plain words
ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1630 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.
IWD in plain words
IWD is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 814 positions, with the top ten at 29.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or IWD?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and IWD returned +27.4%, so IWD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, ACWI or IWD?
- ACWI charges 0.32% a year and IWD charges 0.18%, so IWD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do ACWI and IWD overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 61% of ACWI and 90% of IWD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 40% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against IWD, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-iwd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources