Which returned more over the last year, FXI or TLT?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXI returned −13.8% and TLT returned −6.4%, so TLT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, FXI or TLT?

FXI charges 0.73% a year and TLT charges 0.15%, so TLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FXI vs TLT: how they differ

FXI and TLT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and TLT returned more over the year.

iShares China Large-Cap ETF and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FXI and TLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FXI	Only in TLT
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 9.88%	TREASURY BOND (2OLD) 4.16%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 9.14%	TREASURY BOND (OLD) 4.05%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 8.34%	TREASURY BOND (OTR) 1.03%
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF 6.56%	TREASURY BOND 0.02%
XIAOMI 4.83%
MEITUAN 4.36%
BANK OF CHINA LTD H 4.32%
PING AN INSURANCE (GROUP) CO OF CH 3.80%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

FXI and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF	TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	China Large-Cap	20+ year Treasuries
Total return, 1 year	−13.8%	−6.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−31.3 pts	−23.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.73%	0.15%
Holdings	53	41

FXI in plain words

FXI is an index equity fund tracking the China Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%. It sat 28.5% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

TLT in plain words

TLT is a bond fund tracking the 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.9% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FXI or TLT?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXI returned −13.8% and TLT returned −6.4%, so TLT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FXI or TLT?: FXI charges 0.73% a year and TLT charges 0.15%, so TLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FXI against TLT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FXI against TLT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fxi-vs-tlt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources