Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

TLT vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, TLT returned −7.9% to URTH's +13.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about TLT and URTH

Net assets: $47.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF, and $8.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI World ETF.

At a glance
−7.9%
TLT total return, 1 year
+13.1%
URTH total return, 1 year
0.15%
TLT expense ratio
0.24%
URTH expense ratio

Pair scorecard

TLT costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 21.0 points; TLT is 5.4 times larger.

TLT vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureTLTURTH
Return
Total return, 1 year−7.9%+13.1%
Drawdown
Below its high42.6%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Benchmark
What it tracksICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond IndexMSCI World Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.24%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$47.4bn$8.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight69%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund27.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, TLT and URTH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first TLT URTH
Only in one fund ↓
Only in TLT
TREASURY BOND 4.32%
TREASURY BOND 4.12%
TREASURY BOND (OLD) 4.07%
TREASURY BOND 4.02%
TREASURY BOND 3.93%
TREASURY BOND 3.92%
TREASURY BOND 3.89%
TREASURY BOND 3.88%
Only in URTH
APPLE 5.60%
NVIDIA 5.50%
MICROSOFT 4.12%
AMAZON.COM INC 2.69%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.07%
BROADCOM INC 1.70%
ALPHABET CLASS C 1.62%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.49%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF URTH iShares MSCI World ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries Tracks the MSCI World
Total return, 1 year −7.9% +13.1%
Its benchmark over the same days −7.8% (BBLB) +13.4% (ACWI)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs BBLB −0.3 pts vs ACWI
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.24%
Holdings 47 1254
Net assets, TLT as of Oct 27, 2026 and URTH as of Oct 28, 2026 $47.4bn $8.9bn

TLT and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

TLT and URTH flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
TLT

TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −7.9% with distributions reinvested, against −7.8% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.6% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

URTH

URTH tracks the MSCI World. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 69% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,254 positions, with the top ten at 27.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, TLT or URTH?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, TLT returned −7.9% and URTH +13.1%.
Which is cheaper, TLT or URTH?
TLT is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, TLT against URTH, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/tlt-vs-urth

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.