Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
TLT vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, TLT returned −7.9% to URTH's +13.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about TLT and URTHNet assets: $47.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF, and $8.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI World ETF.
Pair scorecard
TLT costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 21.0 points; TLT is 5.4 times larger.
| Measure | TLT | URTH |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −7.9% | +13.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 42.6%, high on Aug 4, 2020 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index | MSCI World Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.24% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $47.4bn | $8.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 69% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 27.2% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, TLT and URTH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
TLT and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
TLT
TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −7.9% with distributions reinvested, against −7.8% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.6% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.
URTH
URTH tracks the MSCI World. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 69% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,254 positions, with the top ten at 27.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, TLT or URTH?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, TLT returned −7.9% and URTH +13.1%.
- Which is cheaper, TLT or URTH?
- TLT is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, TLT against URTH, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/tlt-vs-urth
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). TLT against URTH. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/tlt-vs-urth
[TLT against URTH (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/tlt-vs-urth)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.