Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

TLT vs VPL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, TLT returned −7.9% to VPL's +24.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about TLT and VPL

Net assets: $47.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF, and $9.0bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF.

At a glance
−7.9%
TLT total return, 1 year
+24.8%
VPL total return, 1 year
0.15%
TLT expense ratio
0.07%
VPL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VPL costs 0.08 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 32.7 points; TLT is 5.1 times larger.

TLT vs VPL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureTLTVPL
Return
Total return, 1 year−7.9%+24.8%
Drawdown
Below its high42.6%, high on Aug 4, 20207.2%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond IndexFTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.07%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$46.2bn$9.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund24.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, TLT and VPL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first TLT VPL
Only in one fund ↓
Only in TLT
TREASURY BOND 4.32%
TREASURY BOND 4.12%
TREASURY BOND (OLD) 4.07%
TREASURY BOND 4.02%
TREASURY BOND 3.93%
TREASURY BOND 3.92%
TREASURY BOND 3.89%
TREASURY BOND 3.88%
Only in VPL
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 7.11%
SK hynix Inc 5.82%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 1.98%
BHP Group Ltd 1.69%
SLBBH1142 1.57%
Toyota Motor Corp 1.51%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia 1.37%
Tokyo Electron Ltd 1.30%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries Tracks an index of Pacific Stock
Total return, 1 year −7.9% +24.8%
Its benchmark over the same days −7.8% (BBLB) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs BBLB not measured
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.07%
Holdings 47 2343
Net assets, TLT as of Oct 27, 2026 and VPL as of Sep 30, 2026 $47.4bn $9.0bn

TLT and VPL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

TLT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
TLT

TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −7.9% with distributions reinvested, against −7.8% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.6% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

VPL

VPL tracks an index of Pacific Stock. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,343 positions, with the top ten at 24.8%. It sat 7.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, TLT or VPL?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, TLT returned −7.9% and VPL +24.8%.
Which is cheaper, TLT or VPL?
VPL is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, TLT against VPL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/tlt-vs-vpl

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.