Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
VGLT vs VPL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, VGLT returned −6.7% to VPL's +24.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about VGLT and VPL
Net assets on Sep 30, 2026: $10.4bn for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF and $9.0bn for Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF.
Pair scorecard
VGLT costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 31.5 points; VGLT is 1.2 times larger.
| Measure | VGLT | VPL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −6.7% | +24.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 38.8%, high on Aug 4, 2020 | 7.2%, high on Jun 22, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index | FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.07% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $10.4bn | $9.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 24.8% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Dec 4, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026 · 881 weekly returnsVPL returned more: +237.5% to +46.2%. VGLT swung less: 12.7% to 16.6%. VPL fell less at its worst: −32.4% to −45.6%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | VGLT | VPL | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +46.2% | +237.5% | VPL | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +2.3% | +7.4% | VPL | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −13.0% | +104.3% | VPL | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 12.7% | 16.6% | VGLT | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 9.1% | 11.7% | VGLT | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −45.6% | −32.4% | VPL | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.12 | 0.42 | VPL | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.17 | 0.60 | VPL | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.05 | 0.23 | VPL | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 881 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, VGLT and VPL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
VGLT and VPL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VGLT and VPL do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. VGLT follows Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index and VPL follows FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Sep 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 VGLT returned −6.7% and VPL +24.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 31.5 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
VGLT
VGLT tracks an index of Long-term Treasury. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −6.7% with distributions reinvested, against −6.7% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 38.8% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.
VPL
VPL tracks an index of Pacific Stock. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,343 positions, with the top ten at 24.8%. It sat 7.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, VGLT or VPL?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VGLT returned −6.7% and VPL +24.8%.
- Which is cheaper, VGLT or VPL?
- VGLT is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, VGLT against VPL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vglt-vs-vpl
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). VGLT against VPL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vglt-vs-vpl
[VGLT against VPL (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vglt-vs-vpl)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.