Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FXI vs VGIT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FXI returned −19.1% to VGIT's −1.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FXI and VGIT

Net assets: $3.7bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares China Large-Cap ETF, and $39.7bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF.

At a glance
−19.1%
FXI total return, 1 year
−1.5%
VGIT total return, 1 year
0.73%
FXI expense ratio
0.03%
VGIT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VGIT costs 0.70 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.6 points; VGIT is 10.2 times larger.

FXI vs VGIT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFXIVGIT
Return
Total return, 1 year−19.1%−1.5%
Drawdown
Below its high32.7%, high on Feb 17, 20213.5%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Benchmark
What it tracksFTSE China 50 IndexBloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.73%0.03%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$3.9bn$39.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund58.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FXI and VGIT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FXI VGIT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FXI
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 9.81%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 8.63%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 8.60%
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF 6.69%
XIAOMI 4.86%
BANK OF CHINA LTD H 4.76%
MEITUAN 4.58%
NETEASE 3.85%
Only in VGIT
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.91%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.89%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.87%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.85%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.83%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.82%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.82%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.81%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF VGIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index of China Large-Cap Tracks an index of Intermediate-Term Treasury
Total return, 1 year −19.1% −1.5%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −1.5% (SCHR)
Gap to its benchmark not measured 0.0 pts vs SCHR
Expense ratio 0.73% 0.03%
Holdings 51 103
Net assets, FXI as of Oct 28, 2026 and VGIT as of Sep 30, 2026 $3.7bn $39.7bn

FXI and VGIT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

FXI flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FXI

FXI tracks an index of China Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −19.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 58.4%. It sat 32.7% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.

VGIT

VGIT tracks an index of Intermediate-Term Treasury. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.5% with distributions reinvested, against −1.5% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FXI or VGIT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXI returned −19.1% and VGIT −1.5%.
Which is cheaper, FXI or VGIT?
VGIT is cheaper, by 0.70 percentage points a year. That is about $70 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FXI against VGIT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fxi-vs-vgit

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.