Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

DYNF vs FXI: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, DYNF returned +14.5% to FXI's −19.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DYNF and FXI

Net assets: $42.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF, and $3.7bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares China Large-Cap ETF.

At a glance
+14.5%
DYNF total return, 1 year
−19.1%
FXI total return, 1 year
0.26%
DYNF expense ratio
0.73%
FXI expense ratio

Pair scorecard

DYNF costs 0.47 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 33.6 points; DYNF is 11.5 times larger.

DYNF vs FXI: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureDYNFFXI
Return
Total return, 1 year+14.5%−19.1%
Drawdown
Below its high32.7%, high on Feb 17, 2021
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedFTSE China 50 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.26%0.73%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026$42.4bn$3.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund40.7%58.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and FXI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DYNF FXI
Only in one fund ↓
Only in DYNF
NVIDIA 8.15%
APPLE 8.14%
MICROSOFT 4.76%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.12%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3.30%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.99%
BROADCOM INC 2.46%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.34%
Only in FXI
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 9.81%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 8.63%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 8.60%
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF 6.69%
XIAOMI 4.86%
BANK OF CHINA LTD H 4.76%
MEITUAN 4.58%
NETEASE 3.85%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of China Large-Cap
Total return, 1 year +14.5% −19.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.3% (PBUS) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +1.2 pts vs PBUS not measured
Expense ratio 0.26% 0.73%
Already in the S&P 500 94.8% 0.0%
Holdings 262 51
Net assets, DYNF as of Oct 27, 2026 and FXI as of Oct 28, 2026 $42.7bn $3.7bn

DYNF and FXI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

DYNF and FXI flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
DYNF

DYNF is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 262 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%.

FXI

FXI tracks an index of China Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −19.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 58.4%. It sat 32.7% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or FXI?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +14.5% and FXI −19.1%.
Which is cheaper, DYNF or FXI?
DYNF is cheaper, by 0.47 percentage points a year. That is about $47 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DYNF and FXI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DYNF and 0% of FXI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DYNF against FXI, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dynf-vs-fxi

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.