Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FXI vs VB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FXI returned −19.1% to VB's +14.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FXI and VB

Net assets: $3.7bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares China Large-Cap ETF, and $76.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF.

At a glance
−19.1%
FXI total return, 1 year
+14.4%
VB total return, 1 year
0.73%
FXI expense ratio
0.03%
VB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VB costs 0.70 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 33.5 points; VB is 19.7 times larger.

FXI vs VB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFXIVB
Return
Total return, 1 year−19.1%+14.4%
Drawdown
Below its high32.7%, high on Feb 17, 20215.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksFTSE China 50 IndexMorningstar US Small Cap Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.73%0.03%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$3.9bn$76.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund58.4%5.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FXI and VB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FXI VB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FXI
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 9.81%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 8.63%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 8.60%
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF 6.69%
XIAOMI 4.86%
BANK OF CHINA LTD H 4.76%
MEITUAN 4.58%
NETEASE 3.85%
Only in VB
SLCMT1142 1.31%
Natera Inc 0.72%
Twilio Inc 0.57%
Revolution Medicines Inc 0.53%
Everpure Inc 0.52%
Illumina Inc 0.52%
Okta Inc 0.44%
Moderna Inc 0.44%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF VB Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of China Large-Cap Tracks an index of Small-Cap
Total return, 1 year −19.1% +14.4%
Expense ratio 0.73% 0.03%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 21.6%
Holdings 51 1303
Net assets, FXI as of Oct 28, 2026 and VB as of Sep 30, 2026 $3.7bn $76.9bn

FXI and VB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

FXI flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FXI

FXI tracks an index of China Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −19.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 58.4%. It sat 32.7% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.

VB

VB tracks an index of Small-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,303 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FXI or VB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXI returned −19.1% and VB +14.4%.
Which is cheaper, FXI or VB?
VB is cheaper, by 0.70 percentage points a year. That is about $70 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FXI and VB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of FXI and 22% of VB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FXI against VB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fxi-vs-vb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.