AVLV · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
AVLV tracks the U.S. Large Cap Value and returned +31.0% over the past year.
Key facts
Its ten largest equity positions
| Holding | Ticker | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Micron Technology Inc | MU | 4.57% | |
| Amazon.com Inc | AMZN | 3.18% | |
| Apple Inc | AAPL | 3.17% | |
| Meta Platforms Inc | META | 2.74% | |
| Exxon Mobil Corp | XOM | 2.59% | |
| Caterpillar Inc | CAT | 2.53% | |
| Lam Research Corp | LRCX | 2.52% | |
| Costco Wholesale Corp | COST | 2.06% | |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co | JPM | 1.79% | |
| Merck & Co Inc | MRK | 1.75% |
Compare AVLV
Also against BITO, BND, BNDX, BOND, BOXX, BSV, BWET, CGBL, CGDV, CGGR, COWZ, CTA, DBMF, DFUS, DGRO, DGRW, DIA, DVY, DYNF, EDV, EEM, EFA, EMB, EMXC, EWJ, EWT, EWY, EWZ, EZU, FBCG, FDVV, FENI, FLKR, FNDX, FTEC, FXI, GARP, GLD, GLDM, GOVT, GRNY, HDV, HGER, HYG, HYMB, IALT, IAU, IBB, IDEV, IEF, IEFA, IEI, IEMG, IGIB, IGM, IGSB, IJH, IJR, IJS, IJT, ILF, INDA, ITOT, IUSB, IVV, IWB, IWC, IWD, IWF, IWM, IWO, IXUS, IYE, IYR, IYW, JAAA, JNK, KRE, LQD, MAGS, MBB, MDY, MGK, MINT, MOAT, MTUM, MUB, NOBL, ONEQ, PDBC, PFF, PULS, PVAL, QQQ, QQQM, QUAL, RDVY, RSP, SCHB, SCHD, SCHF, SCHG, SCHH, SCHP, SCHX, SDY, SGOV, SHV, SHY, SIVR, SLV, SPHD, SPHQ, SPLG, SPMO, SPSB, SPY, SPYD, SPYG, TIP, TLT, URTH, USFR, USHY, USMV, USO, VB, VBIL, VBK, VBR, VCIT, VCLT, VCSH, VDC, VDE, VEA, VEU, VGIT, VGK, VGLT, VGSH, VGT, VHT, VIG, VLUE, VNQ, VO, VOE, VONG, VOO, VOOG, VOX, VPL, VPU, VT, VTEB, VTI, VTIP, VTV, VTWO, VUG, VUSB, VWO, VXF, VXUS, VYM, VYMI, XBI, XHB, XLB, XLC, XLE, XLF, XLG, XLI, XLK, XLP, XLRE, XLU, XLV, XLY, XOP, XOVR, XRT.
Period by period
| Window | Total return | S&P 500 | Gap to S&P 500 | Gap to Nasdaq-100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months | +2.4% | +3.3% | −0.9 pts | +3.2 pts |
| 6 months | +17.8% | +16.0% | +1.8 pts | −2.9 pts |
| 1 year | +31.0% | +17.5% | +13.5 pts | +8.0 pts |
| 3 years | +81.2% | +77.9% | +3.3 pts | −13.9 pts |
| Since listing | +97.8% | +84.0% | +13.9 pts | +0.6 pts |
In plain words
AVLV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 275 positions, with the top ten at 26.9%.
| What it tracks | U.S. Large Cap Value |
|---|---|
| Fund type | Index equity fund |
| Expense ratio (485BPOS XBRL, Dec 29, 2025) | 0.15% |
| Price | $93.53 |
| Listed since | Sep 23, 2021 |
| Net assets (SEC filing, whole fund, as filed for May 31, 2026) | $12.9bn |
| Below its high (ETFIQ) | −1.3% |
| Holdings | 275 |
| Top ten weight | 26.9% |
| Holdings as of (SEC N-PORT) | May 31, 2026 |
| Already in the S&P 500, by weight (ETFIQ) | 84.5% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 (ETFIQ) | 71.3% |
| Already in the Nasdaq-100, by weight (ETFIQ) | 30.4% |
Questions people ask
- How has AVLV performed?
- Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, AVLV returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500. Over three years the figure is +81.2%.
- What does AVLV cost?
- The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
- What does AVLV hold?
- 275 positions as filed for May 31, 2026, with the top ten at 26.9% of the fund. 84% of its weight is in stocks the S&P 500 also holds.
- How far is AVLV below its high?
- 1.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026, measured on the reinvested series to Sep 11, 2026.
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Funds near this one
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVLV, core index fund, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/funds/AVLV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
ETFIQ covers leveraged and inverse, thematic, buffer, option-income, core index and spot crypto ETFs. This fund is here because the other funds here are measured against it and portfolios hold it. ETFIQ is an independent publisher and makes no recommendations. Standards and sources