Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVLV vs COWZ: how they differ

AVLV and COWZ hold 18% of their weight in the same names, and AVLV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and COWZ hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVLV and COWZ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVLVCOWZ
Verizon Communications Inc1.64%1.90%
Gilead Sciences Inc1.29%1.84%
ConocoPhillips1.17%2.17%
United Parcel Service Inc0.95%1.69%
EOG Resources Inc0.90%1.23%
Delta Air Lines Inc0.88%1.48%
Target Corp0.83%1.07%
Devon Energy Corp0.82%1.09%
Comcast Corp0.75%1.71%
ON Semiconductor Corp0.70%0.84%
United Airlines Holdings Inc0.68%0.83%
T-Mobile US Inc0.66%1.78%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVLVOnly in COWZ
Micron Technology Inc 4.57%Altria Group Inc 2.21%
Amazon.com Inc 3.18%CVS Health Corp 2.16%
Apple Inc 3.17%Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.03%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.74%Uber Technologies Inc 2.01%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.59%Pfizer Inc 2.00%
Caterpillar Inc 2.53%Newmont Corp 1.93%
Lam Research Corp 2.52%Booking Holdings Inc 1.87%
Costco Wholesale Corp 2.06%AT&T Inc 1.84%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVLV and COWZ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisPacer
What it isU.S. Large Cap ValueUS Cash Cows 100
Total return, 1 year+31.0%+23.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+13.5 pts+5.9 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.49%
Already in the S&P 50084.5%95.8%
Holdings275100

AVLV in plain words

AVLV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 275 positions, with the top ten at 26.9%.

COWZ in plain words

COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or COWZ?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +31.0% and COWZ returned +23.4%, so AVLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVLV or COWZ?
AVLV charges 0.15% a year and COWZ charges 0.49%, so AVLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVLV and COWZ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVLV and 96% of COWZ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 18% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVLV against COWZ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVLV against COWZ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVLV-COWZ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources