Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs AVLV: how they differ

ACWI and AVLV hold 20% of their weight in the same names, and AVLV returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and AVLV hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACWI and AVLV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingACWIAVLV
APPLE INC.4.02%3.17%
AMAZON.COM, INC.2.58%3.18%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION2.90%1.63%
META PLATFORMS, INC.1.34%2.74%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.0.86%1.79%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION0.66%2.59%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.0.59%4.57%
WALMART INC.0.58%0.89%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION0.45%2.06%
CATERPILLAR INC.0.42%2.53%
NETFLIX, INC.0.40%0.91%
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION0.33%2.52%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWIOnly in AVLV
NVIDIA CORPORATION 4.89%TechnipFMC PLC 0.54%
BROADCOM INC. 1.90%Carnival Corp Ltd 0.53%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 1.73%Nextpower Inc 0.46%
TESLA, INC. 1.09%Viatris Inc 0.37%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 0.76%Solstice Advanced Materials Inc 0.34%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 0.66%BorgWarner Inc 0.34%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 0.58%East West Bancorp Inc 0.31%
ASML Holding N.V. 0.56%Talen Energy Corp/Old 0.30%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

ACWI and AVLV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesAvantis
What it isMSCI ACWIU.S. Large Cap Value
Total return, 1 year+19.1%+31.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.6 pts+13.5 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50061.4%84.5%
Holdings2307275

ACWI in plain words

ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2307 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

AVLV in plain words

AVLV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 275 positions, with the top ten at 26.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or AVLV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and AVLV returned +31.0%, so AVLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or AVLV?
ACWI charges 0.32% a year and AVLV charges 0.15%, so AVLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWI and AVLV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 61% of ACWI and 84% of AVLV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 20% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against AVLV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against AVLV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWI-AVLV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources