Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
ACWX vs COWZ: how they differ
ACWX and COWZ hold 0% of their weight in the same names.
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACWX and COWZ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in ACWX | Only in COWZ |
|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 4.69% | QUALCOMM Inc 2.67% |
| ASML Holding N.V. 1.54% | Altria Group Inc 2.21% |
| SK hynix Inc. 1.33% | ConocoPhillips 2.17% |
| Tencent Holdings Limited 1.07% | CVS Health Corp 2.16% |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.86% | Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.03% |
| ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.81% | Ford Motor Co 2.01% |
| Alibaba Group Holding Limited 0.79% | Uber Technologies Inc 2.01% |
| Novartis AG 0.77% | Pfizer Inc 2.00% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
| ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Pacer |
| What it is | MSCI ACWI ex U.S. | US Cash Cows 100 |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.0% | +23.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +5.5 pts | +5.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.49% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 95.8% |
| Holdings | 1759 | 100 |
ACWX in plain words
ACWX is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI ex U.S.. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1759 positions, with the top ten at 14.6%.
COWZ in plain words
COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or COWZ?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +23.0% and COWZ returned +23.4%, so COWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, ACWX or COWZ?
- ACWX charges 0.32% a year and COWZ charges 0.49%, so ACWX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do ACWX and COWZ overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of ACWX and 96% of COWZ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWX against COWZ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWX-COWZ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources