Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVLV vs SDY: how they differ

AVLV and SDY hold 11% of their weight in the same names, and AVLV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and SDY hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVLV and SDY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVLVSDY
Verizon Communications Inc1.64%2.15%
Exxon Mobil Corp2.59%0.93%
Target Corp0.83%1.55%
Travelers Cos Inc/The0.89%0.69%
CSX Corp1.06%0.62%
Ameriprise Financial Inc0.66%0.60%
QUALCOMM Inc0.51%1.57%
Caterpillar Inc2.53%0.47%
Cummins Inc0.42%0.69%
JB Hunt Transport Services Inc0.45%0.41%
WW Grainger Inc0.75%0.40%
Expeditors International of Washington I0.40%0.48%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVLVOnly in SDY
Micron Technology Inc 4.57%Realty Income Corp 2.14%
Amazon.com Inc 3.18%Kenvue Inc 1.76%
Apple Inc 3.17%Kimberly-Clark Corp 1.75%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.74%AbbVie Inc 1.63%
Lam Research Corp 2.52%Texas Instruments Inc 1.56%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.79%Edison International 1.45%
Merck & Co Inc 1.75%Sysco Corp 1.41%
Union Pacific Corp 1.53%WEC Energy Group Inc 1.41%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVLV and SDY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
SDY
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisState Street
What it isU.S. Large Cap ValueSPDR S&P Dividend
Total return, 1 year+31.0%+11.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+13.5 pts−6.5 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50084.5%84.6%
Holdings275155

AVLV in plain words

AVLV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 275 positions, with the top ten at 26.9%.

SDY in plain words

SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 155 positions, with the top ten at 17.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or SDY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +31.0% and SDY returned +11.0%, so AVLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVLV or SDY?
AVLV charges 0.15% a year and SDY charges 0.35%, so AVLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVLV and SDY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVLV and 85% of SDY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 11% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVLV against SDY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVLV against SDY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVLV-SDY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources