Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs SDY: how they differ

ACWI and SDY hold 9% of their weight in the same names, and ACWI returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and SDY hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACWI and SDY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingACWISDY
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION0.66%0.93%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON0.56%1.00%
CATERPILLAR INC.0.42%0.47%
ABBVIE INC.0.38%1.63%
CHEVRON CORPORATION0.37%1.28%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION2.90%0.36%
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY0.35%1.26%
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY0.33%1.26%
WALMART INC.0.58%0.29%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED0.26%1.56%
Pepsico, Inc.0.22%1.33%
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORAT0.22%1.27%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWIOnly in SDY
NVIDIA CORPORATION 4.89%Medtronic PLC 1.30%
APPLE INC. 4.02%Amcor PLC 0.93%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 2.58%Accenture PLC 0.88%
ALPHABET INC. 2.26%Stanley Black & Decker Inc 0.66%
BROADCOM INC. 1.90%Assurant Inc 0.62%
ALPHABET INC. 1.87%J M Smucker Co/The 0.58%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 1.73%Equity LifeStyle Properties Inc 0.58%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 1.34%Linde PLC 0.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

ACWI and SDY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
SDY
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isMSCI ACWISPDR S&P Dividend
Total return, 1 year+19.1%+11.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.6 pts−6.5 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50061.4%84.6%
Holdings2307155

ACWI in plain words

ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2307 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

SDY in plain words

SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 155 positions, with the top ten at 17.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or SDY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and SDY returned +11.0%, so ACWI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or SDY?
ACWI charges 0.32% a year and SDY charges 0.35%, so ACWI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWI and SDY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 61% of ACWI and 85% of SDY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 9% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against SDY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against SDY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWI-SDY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources