Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVLV vs DGRO: how they differ

AVLV and DGRO hold 26% of their weight in the same names, and AVLV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and DGRO hold 26% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVLV and DGRO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVLVDGRO
Apple Inc3.17%2.94%
Exxon Mobil Corp2.59%2.91%
JPMorgan Chase & Co1.79%3.05%
Merck & Co Inc1.75%1.75%
Microsoft Corp1.63%2.92%
Morgan Stanley1.37%1.28%
ConocoPhillips1.17%0.99%
Walmart Inc0.89%0.95%
Caterpillar Inc2.53%0.79%
Gilead Sciences Inc1.29%0.78%
Union Pacific Corp1.53%0.78%
Wells Fargo & Co0.56%1.29%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVLVOnly in DGRO
Micron Technology Inc 4.57%BROADCOM INC 3.25%
Amazon.com Inc 3.18%JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.64%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.74%ABBVIE INC 2.53%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.64%UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.32%
General Motors Co 1.11%PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE) 2.08%
Flex Ltd 1.06%PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 1.94%
Progressive Corp/The 1.04%HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 1.90%
United Parcel Service Inc 0.95%BANK OF AMERICA CORP 1.84%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVLV and DGRO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisiShares
What it isU.S. Large Cap ValueCore Dividend Growth
Total return, 1 year+31.0%+17.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+13.5 pts−0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50084.5%94.7%
Holdings275394

AVLV in plain words

AVLV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 275 positions, with the top ten at 26.9%.

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or DGRO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +31.0% and DGRO returned +17.4%, so AVLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVLV or DGRO?
AVLV charges 0.15% a year and DGRO charges 0.08%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVLV and DGRO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVLV and 95% of DGRO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 26% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVLV against DGRO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVLV against DGRO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVLV-DGRO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources