Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs DGRO: how they differ

ACWI and DGRO hold 29% of their weight in the same names, and ACWI returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and DGRO hold 29% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACWI and DGRO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingACWIDGRO
APPLE INC.4.02%2.94%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION2.90%2.92%
BROADCOM INC.1.90%3.25%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.0.86%3.05%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY0.76%1.14%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION0.66%2.91%
WALMART INC.0.58%0.95%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON0.56%2.64%
VISA INC.0.56%1.05%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION0.45%0.52%
MASTERCARD INCORPORATED0.43%0.61%
CATERPILLAR INC.0.42%0.79%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWIOnly in DGRO
NVIDIA CORPORATION 4.89%ACCENTURE PLC 0.76%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 2.58%MEDTRONIC PLC 0.72%
ALPHABET INC. 2.26%LINDE PLC 0.65%
ALPHABET INC. 1.87%EATON CORP PLC 0.44%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 1.73%CHUBB LTD (SWITZERLAND) 0.32%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 1.34%NXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV 0.31%
TESLA, INC. 1.09%CRH PLC 0.24%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 0.66%JOHNSON CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL PLC 0.24%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

ACWI and DGRO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isMSCI ACWICore Dividend Growth
Total return, 1 year+19.1%+17.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.6 pts−0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50061.4%94.7%
Holdings2307394

ACWI in plain words

ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2307 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or DGRO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and DGRO returned +17.4%, so ACWI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or DGRO?
ACWI charges 0.32% a year and DGRO charges 0.08%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWI and DGRO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 61% of ACWI and 95% of DGRO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 29% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against DGRO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against DGRO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWI-DGRO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources