Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AIPI vs DGRO: how they differ

Over the year AIPI returned more, +23.7% against +17.4%, and DGRO charges 0.08% against 0.65%.

REX AI EQUITY PREMIUM INCOME ETF and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AIPI and DGRO hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AIPI and DGRO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAIPIDGRO
APPLE INC.2.58%2.94%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION2.52%2.92%
BROADCOM INC.2.46%3.25%
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.3.04%1.73%
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORAT2.98%1.28%
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED3.29%1.10%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AIPIOnly in DGRO
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS, INC. 11.93%JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.05%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC. 8.40%EXXON MOBIL CORP 2.91%
NVIDIA CORPORATION 8.23%JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.64%
Astera Labs, Inc 7.20%ABBVIE INC 2.53%
DATADOG, INC. 6.65%UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.32%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 4.15%PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE) 2.08%
SUPER MICRO COMPUTER, INC. 3.95%PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 1.94%
IONQ Inc 3.62%HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 1.90%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AIPI and DGRO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AIPI
REX AI EQUITY PREMIUM INCOME ETF
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
Where it sitsIncome ETFCore index fund
IssuerREXiShares
What it iscovered call, vs AIQCore Dividend Growth
Total return, 1 year+23.7%+17.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+35.7%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−12.0 pts−0.1 pts
Cash paid, 1 year31.3%not an income fund
Expense ratio0.65%0.08%
Holdingsnot filed394

AIPI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, AIPI paid 31.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +23.7%. AI and technology (AIQ), used as the AI proxy returned +35.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.0 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 35.0%, paid weekly. REX estimates that 100% of the distribution paid was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AIPI or DGRO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AIPI returned +23.7% and DGRO returned +17.4%, so AIPI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AIPI or DGRO?
AIPI charges 0.65% a year and DGRO charges 0.08%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are AIPI and DGRO the same kind of fund?
No. AIPI is an option-income ETF and DGRO is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AIPI against DGRO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AIPI against DGRO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AIPI-DGRO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources