Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
AVLV vs XLY: how they differ
AVLV and XLY hold 10% of their weight in the same names, and AVLV returned more over the year.
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF and State Street(R) Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and XLY hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | AVLV | XLY |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon.com Inc | 3.18% | 22.24% |
| TJX Cos Inc/The | 1.52% | 3.93% |
| General Motors Co | 1.11% | 1.73% |
| Ross Stores Inc | 1.05% | 1.71% |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc | 0.46% | 1.09% |
| Williams-Sonoma Inc | 0.44% | 0.68% |
| Ulta Beauty Inc | 0.43% | 0.49% |
| Deckers Outdoor Corp | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Best Buy Co Inc | 0.30% | 0.37% |
| Lululemon Athletica Inc | 0.29% | 0.30% |
| Tractor Supply Co | 0.27% | 0.41% |
| Ralph Lauren Corp | 0.27% | 0.39% |
| Only in AVLV | Only in XLY |
|---|---|
| Micron Technology Inc 4.57% | Tesla Inc 19.66% |
| Apple Inc 3.17% | Home Depot Inc/The 5.83% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 2.74% | McDonald's Corp 4.16% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp 2.59% | Booking Holdings Inc 3.44% |
| Caterpillar Inc 2.53% | Lowe's Cos Inc 3.08% |
| Lam Research Corp 2.52% | Starbucks Corp 2.90% |
| Costco Wholesale Corp 2.06% | Marriott International Inc/MD 2.02% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.79% | Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 1.97% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | XLY State Street(R) Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Avantis | State Street |
| What it is | U.S. Large Cap Value | Consumer discretionary |
| Total return, 1 year | +31.0% | −4.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +13.5 pts | −21.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 84.5% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 275 | 47 |
AVLV in plain words
AVLV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 275 positions, with the top ten at 26.9%.
XLY in plain words
XLY is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer discretionary. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 47 positions, with the top ten at 69.2%. It sat 8.9% below its high of Jan 12, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or XLY?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +31.0% and XLY returned −4.1%, so AVLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, AVLV or XLY?
- AVLV charges 0.15% a year and XLY charges 0.08%, so XLY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do AVLV and XLY overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVLV and 100% of XLY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 10% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVLV against XLY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVLV-XLY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources