Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVLV vs IWF: how they differ

AVLV and IWF hold 21% of their weight in the same names, and AVLV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and IWF hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVLV and IWF both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVLVIWF
Micron Technology Inc4.57%3.86%
Apple Inc3.17%6.72%
Meta Platforms Inc2.74%3.01%
Microsoft Corp1.63%4.11%
Lam Research Corp2.52%1.61%
Caterpillar Inc2.53%1.44%
Applied Materials Inc1.06%1.70%
KLA Corp0.93%1.17%
Netflix Inc0.91%0.89%
Amazon.com Inc3.18%0.57%
Costco Wholesale Corp2.06%0.54%
TJX Cos Inc/The1.52%0.23%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVLVOnly in IWF
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.59%NVIDIA CORPORATION 13.85%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.79%BROADCOM INC. 5.21%
Merck & Co Inc 1.75%TESLA, INC. 3.65%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.64%ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 2.84%
Morgan Stanley 1.37%ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 2.80%
Gilead Sciences Inc 1.29%MASTERCARD INCORPORATED 1.23%
ConocoPhillips 1.17%GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 1.15%
General Motors Co 1.11%SANDISK CORPORATION 0.98%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVLV and IWF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisiShares
What it isU.S. Large Cap ValueRussell 1000 growth
Total return, 1 year+31.0%+7.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+13.5 pts−10.5 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.18%
Already in the S&P 50084.5%93.6%
Holdings275368

AVLV in plain words

AVLV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 275 positions, with the top ten at 26.9%.

IWF in plain words

IWF is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 368 positions, with the top ten at 54.4%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or IWF?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +31.0% and IWF returned +7.0%, so AVLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVLV or IWF?
AVLV charges 0.15% a year and IWF charges 0.18%, so AVLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVLV and IWF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVLV and 94% of IWF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 21% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVLV against IWF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVLV against IWF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVLV-IWF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources