Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVLV vs SCHD: how they differ

AVLV and SCHD hold 12% of their weight in the same names, and AVLV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and SCHD hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVLV and SCHD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVLVSCHD
Merck & Co Inc1.75%3.87%
Verizon Communications Inc1.64%3.66%
ConocoPhillips1.17%3.52%
United Parcel Service Inc0.95%1.99%
EOG Resources Inc0.90%1.82%
Target Corp0.83%1.45%
Devon Energy Corp0.82%1.29%
Comcast Corp0.75%2.25%
QUALCOMM Inc0.51%6.75%
Principal Financial Group Inc0.32%0.52%
East West Bancorp Inc0.31%0.42%
Best Buy Co Inc0.30%0.38%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVLVOnly in SCHD
Micron Technology Inc 4.57%Texas Instruments Inc 5.92%
Amazon.com Inc 3.18%UnitedHealth Group Inc 5.10%
Apple Inc 3.17%Coca-Cola Co/The 3.96%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.74%Chevron Corp 3.84%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.59%Procter & Gamble Co/The 3.55%
Caterpillar Inc 2.53%Amgen Inc 3.48%
Lam Research Corp 2.52%PepsiCo Inc 3.45%
Costco Wholesale Corp 2.06%Home Depot Inc/The 3.37%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

AVLV and SCHD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisSchwab
What it isU.S. Large Cap ValueUS dividend
Total return, 1 year+31.0%+27.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+13.5 pts+10.1 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.06%
Already in the S&P 50084.5%95.1%
Holdings27599

AVLV in plain words

AVLV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 275 positions, with the top ten at 26.9%.

SCHD in plain words

SCHD is an index equity fund tracking the US dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 43.7%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or SCHD?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +31.0% and SCHD returned +27.6%, so AVLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVLV or SCHD?
AVLV charges 0.15% a year and SCHD charges 0.06%, so SCHD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVLV and SCHD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVLV and 95% of SCHD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 12% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVLV against SCHD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVLV against SCHD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVLV-SCHD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources