Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVLV vs XRT: how they differ

AVLV and XRT hold 11% of their weight in the same names, and AVLV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and XRT hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVLV and XRT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVLVXRT
Amazon.com Inc3.18%1.35%
Costco Wholesale Corp2.06%1.29%
TJX Cos Inc/The1.52%1.22%
Ross Stores Inc1.05%1.24%
Walmart Inc0.89%1.27%
Target Corp0.83%1.38%
Kroger Co/The0.58%1.17%
Ulta Beauty Inc0.43%1.30%
Dollar Tree Inc0.43%1.48%
Dollar General Corp0.42%1.42%
Burlington Stores Inc0.41%1.31%
Best Buy Co Inc0.30%1.36%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVLVOnly in XRT
Micron Technology Inc 4.57%Groupon Inc 1.78%
Apple Inc 3.17%RealReal Inc/The 1.75%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.74%Bath & Body Works Inc 1.73%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.59%Warby Parker Inc 1.64%
Caterpillar Inc 2.53%Upbound Group Inc 1.59%
Lam Research Corp 2.52%Maplebear Inc 1.55%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.79%Revolve Group Inc 1.52%
Merck & Co Inc 1.75%Victoria's Secret & Co 1.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVLV and XRT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
XRT
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisState Street
What it isU.S. Large Cap ValueSPDR S&P Retail
Total return, 1 year+31.0%−3.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+13.5 pts−20.6 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50084.5%22.5%
Holdings27575

AVLV in plain words

AVLV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 275 positions, with the top ten at 26.9%.

XRT in plain words

XRT is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Retail. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%. It sat 12.2% below its high of Nov 16, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or XRT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +31.0% and XRT returned −3.0%, so AVLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVLV or XRT?
AVLV charges 0.15% a year and XRT charges 0.35%, so AVLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVLV and XRT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVLV and 22% of XRT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 11% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVLV against XRT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVLV against XRT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVLV-XRT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources