Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs XRT: how they differ

ACWI and XRT hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and ACWI returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and XRT hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACWI and XRT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingACWIXRT
AMAZON.COM, INC.2.58%1.35%
WALMART INC.0.58%1.27%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION0.45%1.29%
THE TJX COMPANIES, INC.0.17%1.22%
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.0.09%1.38%
ROSS STORES, INC.0.07%1.24%
AUTOZONE, INC.0.06%1.39%
TARGET CORPORATION0.06%1.38%
CARVANA CO.0.05%1.32%
EBAY INC.0.05%1.42%
THE KROGER CO.0.04%1.17%
CASEY'S GENERAL STORES, INC.0.03%1.17%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWIOnly in XRT
NVIDIA CORPORATION 4.89%Groupon Inc 1.78%
APPLE INC. 4.02%RealReal Inc/The 1.75%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 2.90%Bath & Body Works Inc 1.73%
ALPHABET INC. 2.26%Warby Parker Inc 1.64%
BROADCOM INC. 1.90%Upbound Group Inc 1.59%
ALPHABET INC. 1.87%Coupang Inc 1.55%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 1.73%Maplebear Inc 1.55%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 1.34%Revolve Group Inc 1.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

ACWI and XRT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
XRT
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isMSCI ACWISPDR S&P Retail
Total return, 1 year+19.1%−3.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.6 pts−20.6 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50061.4%22.5%
Holdings230775

ACWI in plain words

ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2307 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

XRT in plain words

XRT is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Retail. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%. It sat 12.2% below its high of Nov 16, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or XRT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and XRT returned −3.0%, so ACWI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or XRT?
ACWI charges 0.32% a year and XRT charges 0.35%, so ACWI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWI and XRT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 61% of ACWI and 22% of XRT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against XRT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against XRT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWI-XRT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources