Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVLV vs QUAL: how they differ

AVLV and QUAL hold 28% of their weight in the same names, and AVLV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and QUAL hold 28% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVLV and QUAL both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVLVQUAL
Apple Inc3.17%6.28%
Meta Platforms Inc2.74%3.50%
Lam Research Corp2.52%3.23%
Caterpillar Inc2.53%2.52%
Microsoft Corp1.63%5.05%
TJX Cos Inc/The1.52%3.19%
Costco Wholesale Corp2.06%1.31%
Merck & Co Inc1.75%1.08%
Applied Materials Inc1.06%2.45%
KLA Corp0.93%2.79%
Netflix Inc0.91%2.00%
Walmart Inc0.89%1.23%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVLVOnly in QUAL
Micron Technology Inc 4.57%NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.52%
Amazon.com Inc 3.18%ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 2.92%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.59%MASTERCARD INCORPORATED 2.30%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.79%BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 2.12%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.64%JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.92%
Union Pacific Corp 1.53%SLB N.V. 1.56%
Morgan Stanley 1.37%ARISTA NETWORKS, INC. 1.49%
Gilead Sciences Inc 1.29%ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION 1.21%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVLV and QUAL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisiShares
What it isU.S. Large Cap ValueMSCI USA Quality Factor
Total return, 1 year+31.0%+16.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+13.5 pts−1.5 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50084.5%98.9%
Holdings275121

AVLV in plain words

AVLV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 275 positions, with the top ten at 26.9%.

QUAL in plain words

QUAL is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 121 positions, with the top ten at 39.1%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or QUAL?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +31.0% and QUAL returned +16.0%, so AVLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVLV or QUAL?
AVLV charges 0.15% a year and QUAL charges 0.15%, so AVLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVLV and QUAL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVLV and 99% of QUAL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 28% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVLV against QUAL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVLV against QUAL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVLV-QUAL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources