Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVLV vs IWO: how they differ

AVLV and IWO hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and AVLV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF and iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and IWO hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVLV and IWO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVLVIWO
Argan Inc0.16%0.66%
InterDigital Inc0.15%0.45%
Oscar Health Inc0.10%0.41%
Lantheus Holdings Inc0.09%0.43%
Urban Outfitters Inc0.08%0.10%
Brinker International Inc0.07%0.44%
StoneX Group Inc0.06%0.52%
Kodiak Gas Services Inc0.06%0.46%
Opendoor Technologies Inc0.05%0.22%
Abercrombie & Fitch Co0.04%0.24%
MYR Group Inc0.04%0.47%
Clear Secure Inc0.04%0.32%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVLVOnly in IWO
Micron Technology Inc 4.57%Moog, Inc. 0.73%
Amazon.com Inc 3.18%BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. 0.68%
Apple Inc 3.17%MaxLinear, Inc. 0.67%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.74%JFrog Ltd. 0.60%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.59%Krystal Biotech, Inc. 0.58%
Caterpillar Inc 2.53%ESCO Technologies, Inc. 0.56%
Lam Research Corp 2.52%FirstCash Holdings, Inc. 0.54%
Costco Wholesale Corp 2.06%D-Wave Quantum, Inc. 0.53%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVLV and IWO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
IWO
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisiShares
What it isU.S. Large Cap ValueRussell 2000 Growth
Total return, 1 year+31.0%+17.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+13.5 pts−0.5 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.24%
Already in the S&P 50084.5%0.0%
Holdings2751133

AVLV in plain words

AVLV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 275 positions, with the top ten at 26.9%.

IWO in plain words

IWO is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1133 positions, with the top ten at 6.1%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or IWO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +31.0% and IWO returned +17.0%, so AVLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVLV or IWO?
AVLV charges 0.15% a year and IWO charges 0.24%, so AVLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVLV and IWO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVLV and 0% of IWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVLV against IWO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVLV against IWO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVLV-IWO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources