Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
AOR vs IWO: how they differ
AOR and IWO hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IWO returned more over the year.
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF and iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, AOR and IWO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in AOR | Only in IWO |
|---|---|
| iShares Core S&P 500 ETF 35.07% | Moog, Inc. 0.73% |
| iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF 32.09% | BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. 0.68% |
| iShares Core MSCI International Develope 17.02% | MaxLinear, Inc. 0.67% |
| iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF 7.29% | Argan, Inc. 0.66% |
| iShares Core International Aggregate Bon 5.57% | JFrog Ltd. 0.60% |
| iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF 1.99% | Krystal Biotech, Inc. 0.58% |
| iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF 0.96% | ESCO Technologies, Inc. 0.56% |
| FirstCash Holdings, Inc. 0.54% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF | IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation | Russell 2000 Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.3% | +17.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −6.2 pts | −0.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.24% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 7 | 1133 |
AOR in plain words
AOR is an index equity fund tracking the Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
IWO in plain words
IWO is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1133 positions, with the top ten at 6.1%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AOR or IWO?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AOR returned +11.3% and IWO returned +17.0%, so IWO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, AOR or IWO?
- AOR charges 0.15% a year and IWO charges 0.24%, so AOR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do AOR and IWO overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AOR and 0% of IWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AOR against IWO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AOR-IWO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources