Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVLV vs XLI: how they differ

AVLV and XLI hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and AVLV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF and State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and XLI hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVLV and XLI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVLVXLI
Caterpillar Inc2.53%8.52%
Union Pacific Corp1.53%2.81%
CSX Corp1.06%1.53%
Deere & Co0.95%2.77%
United Parcel Service Inc0.95%1.39%
Delta Air Lines Inc0.88%1.06%
FedEx Corp0.79%1.19%
WW Grainger Inc0.75%1.03%
Norfolk Southern Corp0.71%1.23%
United Airlines Holdings Inc0.68%0.77%
Cummins Inc0.42%1.71%
Old Dominion Freight Line Inc0.41%0.69%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVLVOnly in XLI
Micron Technology Inc 4.57%General Electric Co 6.77%
Amazon.com Inc 3.18%GE Vernova Inc 5.48%
Apple Inc 3.17%RTX Corp 4.44%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.74%Boeing Co/The 2.96%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.59%Eaton Corp PLC 2.87%
Lam Research Corp 2.52%Uber Technologies Inc 2.55%
Costco Wholesale Corp 2.06%Vertiv Holdings Co 2.23%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.79%Parker-Hannifin Corp 2.14%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVLV and XLI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
XLI
State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisState Street
What it isU.S. Large Cap ValueIndustrials
Total return, 1 year+31.0%+14.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+13.5 pts−3.3 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50084.5%100.0%
Holdings27581

AVLV in plain words

AVLV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 275 positions, with the top ten at 26.9%.

XLI in plain words

XLI is an index equity fund tracking the Industrials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 81 positions, with the top ten at 41.4%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or XLI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +31.0% and XLI returned +14.3%, so AVLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVLV or XLI?
AVLV charges 0.15% a year and XLI charges 0.08%, so XLI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVLV and XLI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVLV and 100% of XLI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVLV against XLI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVLV against XLI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVLV-XLI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources